In Cartesian coordinates, tensor analysis is simpler because basis vectors are constant and orthonormal. This eliminates the distinction between covariant and contravariant indices. Tensor transformations are also straightforward, using constant coefficients instead of partial derivatives. For tensor integration, components can be integrated individually, unlike in general coordinates where basis vectors vary with position. The volume element is a simple product of differentials in Cartesian coordinates, but it includes the metric determinant's square root in general coordinates to remain a scalar. The text concludes by noting a key limitation of tensor integration in general spaces: the result doesn't belong to a single point and can't be expressed in a single basis, a problem that scalar integrals don't have.

<aside> 🧪

🫧Cue Column

🎬Animated results and interactive web

</aside>

• Cartesian vs. General Coordinates: The text highlights the simplification of tensor analysis in Cartesian coordinates. In this system, there's no distinction between covariant and contravariant indices because the basis vectors are constant and orthonormal. This contrasts with the more complex, general framework where such distinctions are crucial.
• Tensor Transformation in Cartesian Coordinates: Transformations between different Cartesian coordinate systems are simple. The partial derivatives used in general tensor transformations reduce to constant transformation coefficients $\left(a_i^{i^{\prime}}\right)$. The Jacobian of these transformations is always $\pm 1$, which means tensor densities can be treated as regular tensors when restricted to right-handed Cartesian coordinate systems.
• Integration of Tensors: The process of integrating tensors is introduced by first considering the simpler case of Cartesian coordinates. Since the basis vectors are constant, tensor components can be integrated individually. This is not possible in general coordinate systems where the basis vectors vary with position.
• Volume Element: The volume element is shown to be a scalar quantity that transforms differently in general coordinates. While it's simply $d V=d x^1 d x^2 d x^3$ in Cartesian coordinates, it becomes $d V=\sqrt{g} d^N y$ in a general coordinate system, where $\sqrt{g}$ is the square root of the metric determinant. This term accounts for the changing basis vectors and ensures the volume element remains a scalar.
• Limitations of Tensor Integration: The text concludes by pointing out a major challenge of integrating tensors in general spaces: the basis vectors are not constant. This means a resulting tensor integral (like a volume integral) doesn't belong to a single point in space and cannot be easily expressed in a specific basis. This is a problem that doesn't exist for scalar integrals, as they don't require a basis.

🫧Cue Column

<aside> 🧪

1. The Outer Product and Tensor Transformations
2. Operations and Properties of Tensors
3. The Metric Tensor Covariant Derivatives and Tensor Densities
4. Tensors in Cartesian Coordinates and Their Integration
5. Applications of Tensors in Solid Mechanics Electromagnetism and Classical Mechanics

🫧Condensed notes-1

</aside>

🎬Animated results and interactive web

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLG2qYtL4WVLdpliBd9s3XjuCVET_ZIU9e

<aside> 🎬

1. how the Kronecker delta and Christoffel symbols behave in a Cartesian coordinate system
2. visualize the relationship between the angular velocity vector and the angular momentum vector for a solid object
3. focus on how a force defined by the stress tensor acts on a surface resulting in a total force vector
4. calculates the two non-zero components of the moment of inertia tensor based on the cylinder's properties
5. how changing the external magnetic field affects the forces on a current-carrying wire
6. visualize the buoyant force on a submerged object and how the total force changes by adjusting the densities
7. the buoyant force on an object immersed in a fluid with the pressure field is equal to the force on the corresponding volume </aside>