In non-Cartesian coordinate systems, the basis vectors are not of unit length, causing the components to behave differently. The process uses the metric tensor as a conversion tool, which accounts for the varying scale of the coordinate system. The result shows that while the initial contravariant component $\left(B^\phi\right)$ depends on the radial distance $(\rho)$ from the wire, the final covariant component ( $B_\phi$ ) is constant, directly representing the physical field strength after accounting for the basis vector's length.
<aside>
🧄
✍️Mathematical Proof
$\complement\cdots$Counselor
</aside>
Distinction Between Components: In non-Cartesian coordinate systems like cylindrical coordinates, the basis vectors are not always unit vectors and can change magnitude with position. The contravariant components ( $B^\rho, B^\phi, B^z$ ) are coefficients used to represent the vector in terms of these basis vectors. The covariant components ( $B_\rho, B_\phi, B_z$ ) are projections of the vector onto the basis vectors, representing the physical field strength.
Role of the Metric Tensor: The metric tensor, $g_{i j}$, acts as a conversion tool. It is the core object that contains information about the geometry of the coordinate system. Multiplying the contravariant components by the metric tensor correctly scales them to yield the covariant components, reflecting the true physical behavior of the field.
Physical Significance: The result of the calculation, $B_\phi=\frac{\mu_0 I}{2 \pi}$, shows that the covariant component is independent of $\rho$. This is counterintuitive at first, but it makes sense when you consider that the basis vector $e_\phi$ has a length of $\rho$. This means that the product $B^\phi \cdot e_\phi$ (contravariant component times basis vector) gives the physical field magnitude, which correctly decreases with distance from the wire as $\frac{\mu_0 I}{2 \pi \rho}$. The covariant component, $B_\phi$, effectively absorbs this $\rho$ dependence into its definition, making it constant. This demonstrates why covariant components often have a more direct physical interpretation in these curved coordinate systems.
✍️Mathematical Proof
‣
<aside>
🧄
- Derivation of Tensor Transformation Properties for Mixed Tensors
- The Polar Tensor Basis in Cartesian Form
- Verifying the Rank Two Zero Tensor
- Tensor Analysis of Electric Susceptibility in Anisotropic Media
- Analysis of Ohm's Law in an Anisotropic Medium
- Verifying Tensor Transformations
- Proof of Coordinate Independence of Tensor Contraction
- Proof of a Tensor's Invariance Property
- Proving Symmetry of a Rank-2 Tensor
- Tensor Symmetrization and Anti-Symmetrization Properties
- Symmetric and Antisymmetric Tensor Contractions
- The Uniqueness of the Zero Tensor under Specific Symmetry Constraints
- Counting Independent Tensor Components Based on Symmetry
- Transformation of the Inverse Metric Tensor
- Finding the Covariant Components of a Magnetic Field
- Covariant Nature of the Gradient
- Christoffel Symbol Transformation Rule Derivation
- Contraction of the Christoffel Symbols and the Metric Determinant
- Divergence of an Antisymmetric Tensor in Terms of the Metric Determinant
- Calculation of the Metric Tensor and Christoffel Symbols in Spherical Coordinates
- Christoffel Symbols for Cylindrical Coordinates
- Finding Arc Length and Curve Length in Spherical Coordinates
- Solving for Metric Tensors and Christoffel Symbols
- Metric Tensor and Line Element in Non-Orthogonal Coordinates
- Tensor vs. Non-Tensor Transformation of Derivatives
- Verification of Covariant Derivative Identities
- Divergence in Spherical Coordinates Derivation and Verification
- Laplace Operator Derivation and Verification in Cylindrical Coordinates
- Divergence of Tangent Basis Vectors in Curvilinear Coordinates
- Derivation of the Laplacian Operator in General Curvilinear Coordinates
- Verification of Tensor Density Operations
- Verification of the Product Rule for Jacobian Determinants and Tensor Density Transformation
- Metric Determinant and Cross Product in Scaled Coordinates
- Vanishing Divergence of the Levi-Civita Tensor
- Curl and Vector Cross-Product Identity in General Coordinates
- Curl of the Dual Basis in Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates
- Proof of Covariant Index Anti-Symmetrisation
- Affine Transformations and the Orthogonality of Cartesian Rotations
- Fluid Mechanics Integrals for Mass and Motion
- Volume Elements in Non-Cartesian Coordinates (Jacobian Method)
- Young's Modulus and Poisson's Ratio in Terms of Bulk and Shear Moduli
- Tensor Analysis of the Magnetic Stress Tensor
- Surface Force for Two Equal Charges
- Total Electromagnetic Force in a Source-Free Static Volume
- Proof of the Rotational Identity
- Finding the Generalized Inertia Tensor for the Coupled Mass System
- Tensor Form of the Centrifugal Force in Rotating Frames
- Derivation and Calculation of the Gravitational Tidal Tensor
🧄Proof and Derivation-1
</aside>