By applying the divergence theorem in conjunction with the vector identity $\nabla \cdot( \phi B )=( \nabla \phi ) \cdot B + \phi ( \nabla \cdot B )$ and the physical principles of electric fields being perpendicular to equipotential surfaces, and magnetic fields being divergence-free, it can be proven that the volume integral of $\overrightarrow{ E } \cdot \overrightarrow{ B }$ inside a closed surface where the potential $\phi$ is constant is equal to zero.

<aside> 🧄

✍️Mathematical Proof

$\gg$Mathematical Structures Underlying Physical Laws

$\complement\cdots$Counselor

</aside>

Divergence Theorem

This is the central tool used in the proof. It allows us to convert a volume integral of a divergence into a surface integral over the enclosing surface. This is a powerful technique in vector calculus.

Vector Identity

The identity $\nabla \cdot(\phi B)=(\nabla \phi) \cdot B+\phi(\nabla \cdot B)$ is the trick that makes the problem solvable. It links the dot product of the fields, $E \cdot B$, to a term that can be integrated using the divergence theorem.

$E$ and Equipotential Surfaces

The electric field lines are always perpendicular to the equipotential surfaces. This is a fundamental property of the electric potential.

Divergence-Free Magnetic Field

The condition $\nabla \cdot B=0$ means there are no magnetic monopoles. The magnetic field lines always form closed loops without a beginning or end, and the net magnetic flux through any closed surface is zero.

🎬Demonstration

The demonstration of how the divergence theorem and boundary conditions can be applied to prove that the volume integral of the dot product of an electric field (radial, emanating from an equipotential surface) and a divergence-free magnetic field (tangential) inside a closed surface equals zero. This is visually represented through a sequence of frames, showcasing the setup, the fields, the integrand mapping, and the final result.

Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field

Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field

✍️Mathematical Proof

<aside> 🧄

Proving the Cross Product Rules with the Levi-Civita Symbol

Proving the Epsilon-Delta Relation and the Bac-Cab Rule

Simplifying Levi-Civita and Kronecker Delta Identities

Dot Cross and Triple Products

Why a Cube's Diagonal Angle Never Changes

How the Cross Product Relates to the Sine of an Angle

Finding the Shortest Distance and Proving Orthogonality for Skew Lines

A Study of Helical Trajectories and Vector Dynamics

The Power of Cross Products: A Visual Guide to Precessing Vectors

Divergence and Curl Analysis of Vector Fields

Unpacking Vector Identities: How to Apply Divergence and Curl Rules

Commutativity and Anti-symmetry in Vector Calculus Identities

Double Curl Identity Proof using the epsilon-delta Relation

The Orthogonality of the Cross Product Proved by the Levi-Civita Symbol and Index Notation

Surface Parametrisation and the Verification of the Gradient-Normal Relationship

Proof and Implications of a Vector Operator Identity

Conditions for a Scalar Field Identity

Solution and Proof for a Vector Identity and Divergence Problem

Kinematics and Vector Calculus of a Rotating Rigid Body

Work Done by a Non-Conservative Force and Conservative Force

The Lorentz Force and the Principle of Zero Work Done by a Magnetic Field

Calculating the Area of a Half-Sphere Using Cylindrical Coordinates

Divergence Theorem Analysis of a Vector Field with Power-Law Components

Total Mass in a Cube vs. a Sphere

Momentum of a Divergence-Free Fluid in a Cubic Domain

Total Mass Flux Through Cylindrical Surfaces

Analysis of Forces and Torques on a Current Loop in a Uniform Magnetic Field

Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field

</aside>