To accurately calculate and interpret mass flux, converting the velocity field to the appropriate coordinate system (e.g., cylindrical) is crucial, especially when dealing with surfaces defined in that system. The mass flux value itself then provides a quantitative measure of the net rate of mass flow across a surface, with a positive flux indicating outflow, negative indicating inflow, and zero signifying flow along the surface rather than through it.

<aside> 🧄

✍️Mathematical Proof

$\gg$Mathematical Structures Underlying Physical Laws

$\complement\cdots$Counselor

</aside>

The Importance of Coordinate System Conversion

The first and most critical step was converting the Cartesian velocity field into cylindrical coordinates. This was essential because the surfaces given in the problem were defined cylindrically. Failing to do this would have made the calculations much more complex, if not impossible. The simplified form of the velocity field, $v=\frac{v_0}{L}\left(\rho e_\phi+L e_z\right)$, revealed the true nature of the flow: a combination of rotational motion ( $e_\phi$ ) and a constant vertical flow ( $e_z$ ).

Physical Interpretation of Mass Flux

The value of the mass flux, $\Phi$, represents the net rate of mass flow across a given surface. A positive flux means fluid is flowing out of the volume, a negative flux means fluid is flowing in, and a zero flux means there is no net flow across the surface.

🎬Demonstration

The mass flux is a quantitative measure of how much fluid is passing through a given surface per unit of time. It directly translates the abstract mathematical concept of a surface integral into a tangible physical quantity. A non-zero mass flux indicates a net flow of mass, while a zero flux indicates that the fluid is flowing along the surface, but not through it.

compute the mass flux of the fluid through three surfaces

compute the mass flux of the fluid through three surfaces

✍️Mathematical Proof

<aside> 🧄

Proving the Cross Product Rules with the Levi-Civita Symbol

Proving the Epsilon-Delta Relation and the Bac-Cab Rule

Simplifying Levi-Civita and Kronecker Delta Identities

Dot Cross and Triple Products

Why a Cube's Diagonal Angle Never Changes

How the Cross Product Relates to the Sine of an Angle

Finding the Shortest Distance and Proving Orthogonality for Skew Lines

A Study of Helical Trajectories and Vector Dynamics

The Power of Cross Products: A Visual Guide to Precessing Vectors

Divergence and Curl Analysis of Vector Fields

Unpacking Vector Identities: How to Apply Divergence and Curl Rules

Commutativity and Anti-symmetry in Vector Calculus Identities

Double Curl Identity Proof using the epsilon-delta Relation

The Orthogonality of the Cross Product Proved by the Levi-Civita Symbol and Index Notation

Surface Parametrisation and the Verification of the Gradient-Normal Relationship

Proof and Implications of a Vector Operator Identity

Conditions for a Scalar Field Identity

Solution and Proof for a Vector Identity and Divergence Problem

Kinematics and Vector Calculus of a Rotating Rigid Body

Work Done by a Non-Conservative Force and Conservative Force

The Lorentz Force and the Principle of Zero Work Done by a Magnetic Field

Calculating the Area of a Half-Sphere Using Cylindrical Coordinates

Divergence Theorem Analysis of a Vector Field with Power-Law Components

Total Mass in a Cube vs. a Sphere

Momentum of a Divergence-Free Fluid in a Cubic Domain

Total Mass Flux Through Cylindrical Surfaces

</aside>