The hyperbolic coordinate system is non-orthogonal because its coordinate lines (rays and hyperbolas) do not generally intersect at right angles. This is mathematically confirmed by the non-zero inner product of its tangent basis vectors. The system is only orthogonal under two specific conditions: along the ray where $u=0$ and at the origin where $v=0$.

<aside> 🧄

✍️Mathematical Proof

$\gg$Mathematical Structures Underlying Physical Laws

$\complement\cdots$Counselor

</aside>

Non-Orthogonal Nature

Unlike common systems like polar or cylindrical coordinates, hyperbolic coordinates are not orthogonal. The inner product of the tangent basis vectors, $E_u \cdot E_v$, is not zero, which means the coordinate lines for constant $u$ and constant $v$ do not intersect at right angles. This is a fundamental characteristic that distinguishes them from more familiar orthogonal systems.

Geometric Interpretation

The coordinate lines have distinct geometric shapes in the Cartesian plane. The lines of constant $u$ are rays from the origin, while the lines of constant $v$ are hyperbolas given by the equation $x^1 x^2=v^2$. This unique geometry is a direct result of the exponential transformation relations.

Transformation Relations

The system is defined by the transformations $x^1=v e^u$ and $x^2=v e^{-u}$. The inverse transformations, which are crucial for expressing $u$ and $v$ in terms of Cartesian coordinates, are $u=\frac{1}{2} \ln \left(\frac{x^1}{x^2}\right)$ and $v=\sqrt{x^1 x^2}$.

Basis Vectors

The tangent basis vectors, $E_u$ and $E_v$, and the dual basis vectors, $E^u$ and $E^v$, are explicitly calculated. Their non-orthogonality is evident from the non-zero inner products, such as $E_u$. $E_v=2 v \sinh (2 u)$. These basis vectors are essential for performing vector operations and understanding the local geometry of the coordinate system.

🎬Demonstration

The animation visually confirms that the hyperbolic coordinate system is non-orthogonal in general, as the lines of constant $u$ (rays) and constant $v$ (hyperbolas) intersect at angles other than 90 degrees. However, it also highlights the two specific conditions where orthogonality is achieved: along the ray where $u=0$, and at the origin itself where $v=0$.

how the non-orthogonal grid is formed by the hyperbolic and radial lines

how the non-orthogonal grid is formed by the hyperbolic and radial lines

✍️Mathematical Proof

<aside> 🧄

Proving the Cross Product Rules with the Levi-Civita Symbol

Proving the Epsilon-Delta Relation and the Bac-Cab Rule

Simplifying Levi-Civita and Kronecker Delta Identities

Dot Cross and Triple Products

Why a Cube's Diagonal Angle Never Changes

How the Cross Product Relates to the Sine of an Angle

Finding the Shortest Distance and Proving Orthogonality for Skew Lines

A Study of Helical Trajectories and Vector Dynamics

The Power of Cross Products: A Visual Guide to Precessing Vectors

Divergence and Curl Analysis of Vector Fields

Unpacking Vector Identities: How to Apply Divergence and Curl Rules

Commutativity and Anti-symmetry in Vector Calculus Identities

Double Curl Identity Proof using the epsilon-delta Relation

The Orthogonality of the Cross Product Proved by the Levi-Civita Symbol and Index Notation

Surface Parametrisation and the Verification of the Gradient-Normal Relationship

Proof and Implications of a Vector Operator Identity

Conditions for a Scalar Field Identity

Solution and Proof for a Vector Identity and Divergence Problem

Kinematics and Vector Calculus of a Rotating Rigid Body

Work Done by a Non-Conservative Force and Conservative Force

The Lorentz Force and the Principle of Zero Work Done by a Magnetic Field

Calculating the Area of a Half-Sphere Using Cylindrical Coordinates

Divergence Theorem Analysis of a Vector Field with Power-Law Components

Total Mass in a Cube vs. a Sphere

Momentum of a Divergence-Free Fluid in a Cubic Domain

Total Mass Flux Through Cylindrical Surfaces

Analysis of Forces and Torques on a Current Loop in a Uniform Magnetic Field

Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field

Surface Integral to Volume Integral Conversion Using the Divergence Theorem

Circulation Integral vs. Surface Integral

Using Stokes' Theorem with a Constant Scalar Field

Verification of the Divergence Theorem for a Rotating Fluid Flow

Integral of a Curl-Free Vector Field

Boundary-Driven Cancellation in Vector Field Integrals

The Vanishing Curl Integral

Proving the Generalized Curl Theorem

Computing the Magnetic Field and its Curl from a Dipole Vector Potential

Proving Contravariant Vector Components Using the Dual Basis

Verification of Orthogonal Tangent Vector Bases in Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates

Vector Field Analysis in Cylindrical Coordinates

Vector Field Singularities and Stokes' Theorem

</aside>