The app illustrates that the work done by a non-conservative force field, such as the one described, is path-dependent, meaning the calculated work varies along different trajectories (circular vs. straight line) despite identical starting and ending points, unlike the path-independent work associated with conservative forces. This path dependence of work performed by non-conservative forces like friction, air resistance, etc., implies that mechanical energy within the system is not conserved but can be transformed into other forms, such as heat. The calculation employs line integrals and path parametrization to determine the work done, emphasizing the necessity of these mathematical tools when analyzing force fields and trajectories.
<aside>
🧄
✍️Mathematical Proof
$\complement\cdots$Counselor
</aside>
Work depends on the path taken
The calculation demonstrates that the work done by the force field in moving a particle between two specific points ( $\left(r_0, 0\right)$ to $\left(0, r_0\right)$ ) varies depending on the path followed. In this case, the work done along a circular path ( $W_a=\frac{1}{2} k \pi r_0^2$ ) is different from the work done along a straight line path ( $W_b=k r_0^2$ ).
Force field is non-conservative
Since the work done is path-dependent, the force field $F=k\left(x^1 e_2-x^2 e_1\right)$ is classified as a non-conservative force field.
Contrast with conservative forces
This is in contrast to conservative force fields (like gravity), where the work done depends only on the starting and ending points, regardless of the path taken. For conservative forces, the work done in a closed loop (starting and ending at the same point) is zero.
Implication of path dependence
The path-dependent nature of work done by nonconservative forces implies that mechanical energy is not necessarily conserved in such systems. This energy might be converted into other forms like heat, as in the case of friction.
Mathematical tools for calculating work done
The example showcases the use of line integrals and parametrization of paths for calculating work done by a force field along a specific trajectory. It highlights that when working with force fields and paths, understanding the concept of line integrals is crucial for accurate calculation of the work done.
✍️Mathematical Proof
‣
<aside>
🧄
- Proving the Cross Product Rules with the Levi-Civita Symbol
- Proving the Epsilon-Delta Relation and the Bac-Cab Rule
- Simplifying Levi-Civita and Kronecker Delta Identities
- Dot Cross and Triple Products
- Why a Cube's Diagonal Angle Never Changes
- How the Cross Product Relates to the Sine of an Angle
- Finding the Shortest Distance and Proving Orthogonality for Skew Lines
- A Study of Helical Trajectories and Vector Dynamics
- The Power of Cross Products: A Visual Guide to Precessing Vectors
- Divergence and Curl Analysis of Vector Fields
- Unpacking Vector Identities: How to Apply Divergence and Curl Rules
- Commutativity and Anti-symmetry in Vector Calculus Identities
- Double Curl Identity Proof using the epsilon-delta Relation
- The Orthogonality of the Cross Product Proved by the Levi-Civita Symbol and Index Notation
- Surface Parametrisation and the Verification of the Gradient-Normal Relationship
- Proof and Implications of a Vector Operator Identity
- Conditions for a Scalar Field Identity
- Solution and Proof for a Vector Identity and Divergence Problem
- Kinematics and Vector Calculus of a Rotating Rigid Body
- Work Done by a Non-Conservative Force and Conservative Force
- The Lorentz Force and the Principle of Zero Work Done by a Magnetic Field
- Calculating the Area of a Half-Sphere Using Cylindrical Coordinates
- Divergence Theorem Analysis of a Vector Field with Power-Law Components
- Total Mass in a Cube vs. a Sphere
- Momentum of a Divergence-Free Fluid in a Cubic Domain
- Total Mass Flux Through Cylindrical Surfaces
- Analysis of Forces and Torques on a Current Loop in a Uniform Magnetic Field
- Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field
- Surface Integral to Volume Integral Conversion Using the Divergence Theorem
- Circulation Integral vs. Surface Integral
- Using Stokes' Theorem with a Constant Scalar Field
- Verification of the Divergence Theorem for a Rotating Fluid Flow
- Integral of a Curl-Free Vector Field
- Boundary-Driven Cancellation in Vector Field Integrals
- The Vanishing Curl Integral
- Proving the Generalized Curl Theorem
- Computing the Magnetic Field and its Curl from a Dipole Vector Potential
- Proving Contravariant Vector Components Using the Dual Basis
- Verification of Orthogonal Tangent Vector Bases in Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates
- Vector Field Analysis in Cylindrical Coordinates
- Vector Field Singularities and Stokes' Theorem
- Compute Parabolic coordinates-related properties
- Analyze Flux and Laplacian of The Yukawa Potential
- Verification of Vector Calculus Identities in Different Coordinate Systems
- Analysis of a Divergence-Free Vector Field
- The Uniqueness Theorem for Vector Fields
- Analysis of Electric Dipole Force Field
🧄Proof and Derivation-2
</aside>