The proof for this relies on applying the well-known Regular Curl Theorem (Stokes' Theorem) to a cleverly chosen vector field, effectively demonstrating how core principles of vector calculus can be used to derive new, elegant relationships. The visualization reinforces this by showing how gradient vectors, which point only in the direction of steepest ascent, have no rotational component, thus confirming that their curl is indeed zero.

<aside> 🧄

✍️Mathematical Proof

$\gg$Mathematical Structures Underlying Physical Laws

$\complement\cdots$Counselor

</aside>

Method of Proof

The proof relies on a common technique in vector calculus: using a known theorem (the regular Curl Theorem, or Stokes' Theorem) as a foundation and applying it to a cleverly chosen, specific vector field. This is a powerful and elegant way to prove new identities.

Choice of Vector Field

The key to the proof is setting the vector field $A$ equal to the product of a scalar field $f$ and an arbitrary constant vector $c$ (i.e., $A=f c$ ). This choice allows you to simplify the equations and factor out the constant vector, leading to the desired result.

Reliance on Product Rule and Scalar Triple Product

The proof utilizes two key vector identities: the product rule for the curl, $\nabla \times(f c)=(\nabla f) \times c$, and the scalar triple product, $a \times b \cdot c=c \cdot a \times b$. Both are essential for manipulating the right-hand side of the equation and simplifying the integral.

Generalizability

The use of an arbitrary constant vector $c$ is crucial. Because the final equality holds true for any constant vector, it proves that the two vector expressions themselves must be equal, thus establishing the generalized theorem.

🎬Demonstration

This demo is that the generalized curl theorem, beautifully illustrates a fundamental principle: the path integral of a scalar field around a closed loop is always zero. Since the curl of a gradient is non-existent, the surface integral of a scalar field’s gradient over any surface will always be zero, which means its boundary integral must also be zero. The demo visually reinforces this by showing that the gradient vectors radiate outward without any swirling or rotational component.

the line integral of a scalar field around a closed path is equal to the surface integral of the curl of its gradient

the line integral of a scalar field around a closed path is equal to the surface integral of the curl of its gradient

✍️Mathematical Proof

<aside> 🧄

Proving the Cross Product Rules with the Levi-Civita Symbol

Proving the Epsilon-Delta Relation and the Bac-Cab Rule

Simplifying Levi-Civita and Kronecker Delta Identities

Dot Cross and Triple Products

Why a Cube's Diagonal Angle Never Changes

How the Cross Product Relates to the Sine of an Angle

Finding the Shortest Distance and Proving Orthogonality for Skew Lines

A Study of Helical Trajectories and Vector Dynamics

The Power of Cross Products: A Visual Guide to Precessing Vectors

Divergence and Curl Analysis of Vector Fields

Unpacking Vector Identities: How to Apply Divergence and Curl Rules

Commutativity and Anti-symmetry in Vector Calculus Identities

Double Curl Identity Proof using the epsilon-delta Relation

The Orthogonality of the Cross Product Proved by the Levi-Civita Symbol and Index Notation

Surface Parametrisation and the Verification of the Gradient-Normal Relationship

Proof and Implications of a Vector Operator Identity

Conditions for a Scalar Field Identity

Solution and Proof for a Vector Identity and Divergence Problem

Kinematics and Vector Calculus of a Rotating Rigid Body

Work Done by a Non-Conservative Force and Conservative Force

The Lorentz Force and the Principle of Zero Work Done by a Magnetic Field

Calculating the Area of a Half-Sphere Using Cylindrical Coordinates

Divergence Theorem Analysis of a Vector Field with Power-Law Components

Total Mass in a Cube vs. a Sphere

Momentum of a Divergence-Free Fluid in a Cubic Domain

Total Mass Flux Through Cylindrical Surfaces

Analysis of Forces and Torques on a Current Loop in a Uniform Magnetic Field

Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field

Surface Integral to Volume Integral Conversion Using the Divergence Theorem

Circulation Integral vs. Surface Integral

Using Stokes' Theorem with a Constant Scalar Field

Verification of the Divergence Theorem for a Rotating Fluid Flow

Integral of a Curl-Free Vector Field

Boundary-Driven Cancellation in Vector Field Integrals

The Vanishing Curl Integral

Proving the Generalized Curl Theorem

Computing the Magnetic Field and its Curl from a Dipole Vector Potential

</aside>