The proof for this relies on applying the well-known Regular Curl Theorem (Stokes' Theorem) to a cleverly chosen vector field, effectively demonstrating how core principles of vector calculus can be used to derive new, elegant relationships. The visualization reinforces this by showing how gradient vectors, which point only in the direction of steepest ascent, have no rotational component, thus confirming that their curl is indeed zero.
<aside> 🧄
$\gg$Mathematical Structures Underlying Physical Laws
$\complement\cdots$Counselor
</aside>
The proof relies on a common technique in vector calculus: using a known theorem (the regular Curl Theorem, or Stokes' Theorem) as a foundation and applying it to a cleverly chosen, specific vector field. This is a powerful and elegant way to prove new identities.
The key to the proof is setting the vector field $A$ equal to the product of a scalar field $f$ and an arbitrary constant vector $c$ (i.e., $A=f c$ ). This choice allows you to simplify the equations and factor out the constant vector, leading to the desired result.
The proof utilizes two key vector identities: the product rule for the curl, $\nabla \times(f c)=(\nabla f) \times c$, and the scalar triple product, $a \times b \cdot c=c \cdot a \times b$. Both are essential for manipulating the right-hand side of the equation and simplifying the integral.
The use of an arbitrary constant vector $c$ is crucial. Because the final equality holds true for any constant vector, it proves that the two vector expressions themselves must be equal, thus establishing the generalized theorem.
This demo is that the generalized curl theorem, beautifully illustrates a fundamental principle: the path integral of a scalar field around a closed loop is always zero. Since the curl of a gradient is non-existent, the surface integral of a scalar field’s gradient over any surface will always be zero, which means its boundary integral must also be zero. The demo visually reinforces this by showing that the gradient vectors radiate outward without any swirling or rotational component.
the line integral of a scalar field around a closed path is equal to the surface integral of the curl of its gradient
‣
<aside> 🧄
Proving the Cross Product Rules with the Levi-Civita Symbol
Proving the Epsilon-Delta Relation and the Bac-Cab Rule
Simplifying Levi-Civita and Kronecker Delta Identities
Why a Cube's Diagonal Angle Never Changes
How the Cross Product Relates to the Sine of an Angle
Finding the Shortest Distance and Proving Orthogonality for Skew Lines
A Study of Helical Trajectories and Vector Dynamics
The Power of Cross Products: A Visual Guide to Precessing Vectors
Divergence and Curl Analysis of Vector Fields
Unpacking Vector Identities: How to Apply Divergence and Curl Rules
Commutativity and Anti-symmetry in Vector Calculus Identities
Double Curl Identity Proof using the epsilon-delta Relation
The Orthogonality of the Cross Product Proved by the Levi-Civita Symbol and Index Notation
Surface Parametrisation and the Verification of the Gradient-Normal Relationship
Proof and Implications of a Vector Operator Identity
Conditions for a Scalar Field Identity
Solution and Proof for a Vector Identity and Divergence Problem
Kinematics and Vector Calculus of a Rotating Rigid Body
Work Done by a Non-Conservative Force and Conservative Force
The Lorentz Force and the Principle of Zero Work Done by a Magnetic Field
Calculating the Area of a Half-Sphere Using Cylindrical Coordinates
Divergence Theorem Analysis of a Vector Field with Power-Law Components
Total Mass in a Cube vs. a Sphere
Momentum of a Divergence-Free Fluid in a Cubic Domain
Total Mass Flux Through Cylindrical Surfaces
Analysis of Forces and Torques on a Current Loop in a Uniform Magnetic Field
Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field
Surface Integral to Volume Integral Conversion Using the Divergence Theorem
Circulation Integral vs. Surface Integral
Using Stokes' Theorem with a Constant Scalar Field
Verification of the Divergence Theorem for a Rotating Fluid Flow
Integral of a Curl-Free Vector Field
Boundary-Driven Cancellation in Vector Field Integrals
Proving the Generalized Curl Theorem
Computing the Magnetic Field and its Curl from a Dipole Vector Potential
</aside>