The problem illustrates the significance of Generalized Stokes' Theorem in relating surface integrals to line integrals, particularly emphasizing that the scalar field $\phi(x)$ must be constant on the boundary curve $C$. This constancy allows for simplification of the line integral, transforming it into a fundamental case where the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals applies, ensuring that the integral evaluates to zero. The visual demonstration reinforces that without the boundary condition of a constant scalar field, the integral can yield non-zero results, underscoring the critical role of this condition in achieving a predictable outcome.

<aside> 🧄

✍️Mathematical Proof

$\gg$Mathematical Structures Underlying Physical Laws

$\complement\cdots$Counselor

</aside>

Generalized Stokes' Theorem

This problem highlights a powerful extension of Stokes' theorem. Instead of dealing with the curl of a single vector field, this form relates an integral involving the cross product of two gradients to a line integral of a gradient field.

Constant on a Boundary

The core condition is that the scalar field $\phi(x)$ is constant on the boundary curve $C$. This allows you to pull the value of $\phi$ out of the line integral, turning the problem into a fundamental line integral of a gradient field.

Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals

This theorem states that the line integral of a gradient field along a closed path is always zero. The reason for this is that a gradient field is a conservative field, and the work done by a conservative force around a closed loop is zero. This principle is key to proving the final result.

🎬Demonstration

The demo visually confirms that the condition of a constant scalar field on the boundary is essential for the surface integral to be zero. When the scalar field $\phi$ is constant on the boundary, the line integral evaluates to zero. When $\phi$ is not constant, the line integral has a non-zero value, and the proof fails. This highlights the importance of the initial condition in the problem statement, which turns a potentially complex integral into a straightforward case with a predictable result.

A constant scalar field leads to a zero integral result

A constant scalar field leads to a zero integral result

✍️Mathematical Proof

<aside> 🧄

Proving the Cross Product Rules with the Levi-Civita Symbol

Proving the Epsilon-Delta Relation and the Bac-Cab Rule

Simplifying Levi-Civita and Kronecker Delta Identities

Dot Cross and Triple Products

Why a Cube's Diagonal Angle Never Changes

How the Cross Product Relates to the Sine of an Angle

Finding the Shortest Distance and Proving Orthogonality for Skew Lines

A Study of Helical Trajectories and Vector Dynamics

The Power of Cross Products: A Visual Guide to Precessing Vectors

Divergence and Curl Analysis of Vector Fields

Unpacking Vector Identities: How to Apply Divergence and Curl Rules

Commutativity and Anti-symmetry in Vector Calculus Identities

Double Curl Identity Proof using the epsilon-delta Relation

The Orthogonality of the Cross Product Proved by the Levi-Civita Symbol and Index Notation

Surface Parametrisation and the Verification of the Gradient-Normal Relationship

Proof and Implications of a Vector Operator Identity

Conditions for a Scalar Field Identity

Solution and Proof for a Vector Identity and Divergence Problem

Kinematics and Vector Calculus of a Rotating Rigid Body

Work Done by a Non-Conservative Force and Conservative Force

The Lorentz Force and the Principle of Zero Work Done by a Magnetic Field

Calculating the Area of a Half-Sphere Using Cylindrical Coordinates

Divergence Theorem Analysis of a Vector Field with Power-Law Components

Total Mass in a Cube vs. a Sphere

Momentum of a Divergence-Free Fluid in a Cubic Domain

Total Mass Flux Through Cylindrical Surfaces

Analysis of Forces and Torques on a Current Loop in a Uniform Magnetic Field

Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field

Surface Integral to Volume Integral Conversion Using the Divergence Theorem

Circulation Integral vs. Surface Integral

Using Stokes' Theorem with a Constant Scalar Field

Verification of the Divergence Theorem for a Rotating Fluid Flow

</aside>