The app illustrates that the work done by a non-conservative force field, such as the one described, is path-dependent, meaning the calculated work varies along different trajectories (circular vs. straight line) despite identical starting and ending points, unlike the path-independent work associated with conservative forces. This path dependence of work performed by non-conservative forces like friction, air resistance, etc., implies that mechanical energy within the system is not conserved but can be transformed into other forms, such as heat. The calculation employs line integrals and path parametrization to determine the work done, emphasizing the necessity of these mathematical tools when analyzing force fields and trajectories.

<aside> 🧄

✍️Mathematical Proof

$\gg$Mathematical Structures Underlying Physical Laws

$\complement\cdots$Counselor

</aside>

Work depends on the path taken

The calculation demonstrates that the work done by the force field in moving a particle between two specific points ( $\left(r_0, 0\right)$ to $\left(0, r_0\right)$ ) varies depending on the path followed. In this case, the work done along a circular path ( $W_a=\frac{1}{2} k \pi r_0^2$ ) is different from the work done along a straight line path ( $W_b=k r_0^2$ ).

Force field is non-conservative

Since the work done is path-dependent, the force field $F=k\left(x^1 e_2-x^2 e_1\right)$ is classified as a non-conservative force field.

Contrast with conservative forces

This is in contrast to conservative force fields (like gravity), where the work done depends only on the starting and ending points, regardless of the path taken. For conservative forces, the work done in a closed loop (starting and ending at the same point) is zero.

Implication of path dependence

The path-dependent nature of work done by nonconservative forces implies that mechanical energy is not necessarily conserved in such systems. This energy might be converted into other forms like heat, as in the case of friction.

Mathematical tools for calculating work done

The example showcases the use of line integrals and parametrization of paths for calculating work done by a force field along a specific trajectory. It highlights that when working with force fields and paths, understanding the concept of line integrals is crucial for accurate calculation of the work done.

🎬Demonstration

The work done by a non-conservative force depends on the specific path taken between two points, as seen in the different results for Path A and Path B. In contrast, the work done by a conservative force is completely independent of the path. It only depends on the starting and ending points. For this particular demo, since the starting and ending points are at the same distance from the origin, the work done is exactly zero for both paths.

The work Done Along a Circular Path and a Straight Line under non-conservative force and conservative force

The work Done Along a Circular Path and a Straight Line under non-conservative force and conservative force

✍️Mathematical Proof

<aside> 🧄

Proving the Cross Product Rules with the Levi-Civita Symbol

Proving the Epsilon-Delta Relation and the Bac-Cab Rule

Simplifying Levi-Civita and Kronecker Delta Identities

Dot Cross and Triple Products

Why a Cube's Diagonal Angle Never Changes

How the Cross Product Relates to the Sine of an Angle

Finding the Shortest Distance and Proving Orthogonality for Skew Lines

A Study of Helical Trajectories and Vector Dynamics

The Power of Cross Products: A Visual Guide to Precessing Vectors

Divergence and Curl Analysis of Vector Fields

Unpacking Vector Identities: How to Apply Divergence and Curl Rules

Commutativity and Anti-symmetry in Vector Calculus Identities

Double Curl Identity Proof using the epsilon-delta Relation

The Orthogonality of the Cross Product Proved by the Levi-Civita Symbol and Index Notation

Surface Parametrisation and the Verification of the Gradient-Normal Relationship

Proof and Implications of a Vector Operator Identity

Conditions for a Scalar Field Identity

Solution and Proof for a Vector Identity and Divergence Problem

Kinematics and Vector Calculus of a Rotating Rigid Body

Work Done by a Non-Conservative Force and Conservative Force

The Lorentz Force and the Principle of Zero Work Done by a Magnetic Field

Calculating the Area of a Half-Sphere Using Cylindrical Coordinates

Divergence Theorem Analysis of a Vector Field with Power-Law Components

Total Mass in a Cube vs. a Sphere

Momentum of a Divergence-Free Fluid in a Cubic Domain

Total Mass Flux Through Cylindrical Surfaces

Analysis of Forces and Torques on a Current Loop in a Uniform Magnetic Field

Computing the Integral of a Static Electromagnetic Field

</aside>